Grep · sample report

Customer Document Authenticity Check — You get a field-by-field check of one customer document against stated details, issuer formats and validity rules, with fraud flags and a disposition.

workon demandoperational
Inputs used for this sample
Customer Document Authenticity Check

Document type, issuer and jurisdiction: IRS EIN confirmation letter (CP 575), United States

Details as printed on the document: Notice CP 575 A, dated 03/14/2024; Acme Holdings LLC, 410 Pine St, Austin TX 78701; EIN 12-3456789; form 1065 filing requirement

Customer's stated details: Acme Holdings LLC, EIN 12-3456789, 410 Pine Street Suite 200, Austin TX 78701

Validity rules (optional): Issued within last 90 days; name must match exactly

Acme Holdings LLC - IRS CP 575 A Authenticity Check: Request More (Fails 90-Day Rule)

Interpretation: Checked as of 5 October 2026. "Notice CP 575 A" is read as the original paper EIN notice in the CP 575 A-J series. The firm's rules are applied as given: issued within 90 days, name matches exactly. No image of the document was supplied, so every printed value is a user transcription.

Summary: The letter fails the firm's 90-day rule by a wide margin, and the printed address does not match the stated address (no suite). The EIN prefix is valid, but the register and the EIN itself could not be verified from public sources. Authenticity is neither confirmed nor refuted.

Field comparison

Field On document Stated Reference/register value Match Note
Entity name Acme Holdings LLC Acme Holdings LLC Texas SOS record not retrieved (site returned 403; see Coverage) unverifiable Strings agree with each other; the name is generic and register-unchecked
EIN 12-3456789 12-3456789 No public EIN lookup found; prefix 12 is listed for Andover (IRS valid EINs) match (document vs stated); EIN existence unverifiable Sequential digits 1-9 (inferred red flag)
Address 410 Pine St, Austin TX 78701 410 Pine Street Suite 200, Austin TX 78701 none available mismatch (suite missing) "St" vs "Street" is an abbreviation; the missing suite fails an exact-match standard, which I applied to the address by analogy to the firm's name rule
Issue date 03/14/2024 not_provided Today is 2026-10-05 N/A See recency check
Notice code CP 575 A not_provided IRS describes an original CP575A-J series (IRS CP575 page) unverifiable Series exists; layout not compared
Form requirement Form 1065 not_provided A domestic LLC with two or more members is a partnership for tax unless it elects corporate status (IRS LLC page) consistent (inferred) Implies multi-member LLC; membership unconfirmed
Issuer Not transcribed not_provided none available (issuer assumed to be the IRS from the notice code; inferred) unverifiable Letterhead and return address not supplied

Format and validity checks

Red flags

Disposition

Request more. The letter is stale under the stated rule, the address differs, and neither the entity nor the EIN is independently confirmed. Escalate if the customer cannot supply the items below.

Request:

Do next

  1. Run a Texas SOS entity search by name, then confirm by filing number and formation date.
  2. Have the customer send a fresh IRS confirmation directly from the IRS.
  3. Ask the customer to explain the address difference and give the LLC's member count.

Open items

Coverage note

The Texas SOS site blocked retrieval (403) and I did not use SOSDirect. IRS publishes no public EIN lookup that I found. No postal lookup, sanctions or adverse-media search was run. All sources accessed 2026-10-05.

Sources