Skip to content
For your workRuns on demand

Investment Memo Drafter

You get a cited first-draft IC memo covering thesis, market, traction, valuation, risks, comps, return scenarios and the diligence questions still open.

Built for investors drafting an investment committee memo on a company under diligence.

01

Why this work is hard

The problem

Investors drafting an investment committee memo on a company under diligence spend hours on this by hand: finding the right sources, reading them, checking them against each other and writing up what matters. The work is repetitive, it is easy to miss something, and nobody can show where a claim came from.

The GREP AI agent

Investment Memo Drafter does that work as a GREP AI agent. It runs when you ask, and you can put it on a daily, weekly or monthly schedule. Every run delivers a Word document, with every claim linked to its source.

02

What you get

01
On demand
It runs when you ask, and you can put it on a daily, weekly or monthly schedule.
02
Sourced delivery
Every run delivers a Word document, with every claim linked to its source.
03
Ready to act on
The result is a table, check or decision you can act on, not a chat answer.
04
Make it yours
Clone it, edit its instructions and make it your own in one click.
Use cases
01Investors drafting an investment committee memo on a company under diligence who do this work by hand today
02A one-off answer with a trail an auditor can follow
03Venture capital research without the tab sprawl
04Due diligence research without the tab sprawl
03

What Investment Memo Drafter delivers

Word documentRamp — IC Memo Draft (2026-10-05)
DOCX

Ramp — IC Memo Draft

2026-10-05 | Draft for partner edit; not investment advice

Interpretation. Subject resolved to Ramp (ramp.com), the corporate card and spend-management company founded in 2019. The terms and deck metrics supplied (Series B, $40M at $400M post, $28M ARR, 2,100 customers) do not match the public record for this entity (see Traction). The memo therefore tests the supplied terms and claims against public evidence, and computes returns on the stated terms as instructed. No default valuation was substituted. Template order requested: Summary, Team, Market, Product, Traction, Terms, Risks, Recommendation; the remaining required sections are placed inside that order.

Bottom line

Public sources describe Ramp as a roughly $44B company with over $1B of annualized revenue and 70,000+ customers, not a $28M-ARR, 2,100-customer Series B company. The single biggest open question is whether the deck and terms belong to a different company or to a pre-2021 snapshot of Ramp; nothing else in the memo can be relied on until that is resolved.

1. Summary and thesis

  • Entity mismatch: Ramp announced a $750M Series F at a $44B valuation on June 4, 2026, with over $1B annualized revenue, positive free cash flow and 70,000+ customers (Ramp Series F release). Its actual Series B was $115M at $1.6B in April 2021 (CB Insights).
  • Thesis, if the supplied terms were real (for partner to confirm): a fintech-infrastructure company expanding from cards into procurement, vendor management and accounting would fit the fund’s Series A/B fintech infrastructure focus (TechCrunch, Jun 2026). Fit against the 10x target is mathematically demanding: 3.75% initial ownership needs about a $4B exit before dilution (computed below).
  • Price versus evidence: $400M post cannot be reconciled with any public Ramp round after 2021 ($1.6B at Series B). At the public $44B mark, a $15M check buys about 0.034% (computed), so the 10x bar would need an exit near $440B before dilution.

2. Team

Karim Atiyeh is Co-Founder and Co-CEO; his company profile lists a Harvard BA in electrical and computer engineering and an MS in computer science (Ramp author page). Ramp is headquartered in New York (28 West 23rd St per the same page) and was founded in 2019 (Series F release).

Eric Glyman’s professional history, executive bench, headcount and prior-company outcomes were not retrieved in this pass: not found. Turned into diligence questions below. No personal information is included.

3. Market size with method

Bottom-up inputs I could source: Ramp reports 70,000+ customers and about $200B annualized purchase volume (Series F release). Dividing over $1B of annualized revenue by 70,000 customers gives roughly $14K revenue per customer, and by $200B volume roughly 0.5%. Both are my arithmetic on company-reported figures (inference; the revenue and volume bases are both “annualized” and may not be measured over the same period).

Target-customer count not found. A proper bottom-up needs the count of US businesses by size band, spend per business and card/software penetration; no sourced inputs were gathered, so no TAM figure is asserted. Top-down cross-check only: CB Insights cites a corporate credit card market of $7.4B by 2030 at an 8.3% CAGR (CB Insights). That figure is smaller than Ramp’s own reported revenue run-rate, so it likely uses a narrower definition (interchange only, inference) and should not be used as a ceiling.

Scale context: Ramp’s customers with $100K+ ARR rose to 3,200+ by June 2026 from 2,200+ in November 2025 (Series F release; Nov 2025 release).

4. Product and differentiation

Public sources describe a spend platform that began with corporate cards (early rounds: $8M seed in Aug 2019, $15M in Feb 2020, $30M in Dec 2020 per TechCrunch, Dec 2020) and has added procurement, vendor management and accounting, with AI agents pitched as the growth story (TechCrunch, Jun 2026). This supports the founder-call note that Ramp is expanding into procurement; the expansion is already public and live rather than a future plan.

Named competitors in the press are Brex and Rippling (TechCrunch, Jun 2026). Brex was acquired by Capital One for $5.15B (TechCrunch, Jan 2026). Pricing page, changelog and card-issuer dependencies were not reviewed in depth; the Ramp profile page lists issuing banks Celtic, Column, Sutton and Lead (Ramp author page).

5. Traction

Deck figures are labelled company-reported and tested against public evidence below.

Metric

Value

Status

Source

ARR / annualized revenue

Deck: $28M. Public: over $1B annualized (Jun 2026); Bloomberg-reported run-rate above $1.5B

Company-reported, inconsistent

Series F release ; TechCrunch

Customers

Deck: 2,100. Public: 70,000+ (Jun 2026); 50,000+ (Nov 2025)

Company-reported, inconsistent

Series F release ; Nov 2025 release

Net dollar retention

Deck: 140%. No public figure found

Company-reported, unverifiable

Not found

Burn

Deck: $1.8M/month. Public: positive free cash flow stated by the company

Company-reported, inconsistent

Series F release

Procurement expansion

Founder notes say expanding into procurement; procurement, vendor mgmt and accounting products are public

Company-reported, consistent

TechCrunch

Growth

About $500M annualized revenue twelve months before Nov 2025; over $1B by Nov 2025

Verified (company-reported in press release)

Nov 2025 release

Reviews, hiring, web traffic

Not gathered

Unverifiable (gap)

Not found

Inference: the deck metrics are about 3% of the public revenue figure ($28M vs over $1B) and 3% of customers (2,100 vs 70,000+). The ratio is consistent with a very early snapshot or a different company; it is not consistent with a current Ramp deck.

6. Competition and comps

Company

Stage

Last valuation or multiple (date)

Source

Ramp

Growth (private)

$44B, Series F, Jun 4 2026; $32B, Nov 17 2025; $13B, Mar 2025 (per press); $1.6B, Series B, Apr 2021

Series F ; Brex article ; CB Insights

Brex

Acquired

Capital One deal $5.15B (Jan 2026) vs $12.3B at 2022 Series D-2

TechCrunch

Mercury

Growth (private)

$3.5B valuation (Mar 2025), $650M ARR reported

TechCrunch

BILL Holdings

Public

EV/Revenue LTM 1.9x; market cap $4.36B (quarter ended Jun 29 2026 data; page accessed Oct 5 2026)

Value Sense

Navan

Public

EV/Revenue LTM 7.9x; market cap $5.49B (quarter ended Jul 30 2026 data; page accessed Oct 5 2026)

Value Sense

Rippling

Private

Valuation not retrieved

Not found

Implied Ramp multiple: $44B over “over $1B” annualized revenue is at most about 44x (arithmetic; the revenue figure is a floor, and Bloomberg’s reported run-rate above $1.5B would imply roughly 29x). That compares with 1.9x for BILL and 7.9x for Navan, so public peers do not support a mark-to-comps bridge to Ramp’s private price.

7. Valuation and terms

As supplied: Series B, $40M raise at $400M post-money, fund leads with $15M. Arithmetic: new money is 10.0% of the company ($40M / $400M); the fund’s check buys 3.75% ($15M / $400M) before dilution.

Against public record: Ramp’s last public price is $44B (June 2026), 110x the supplied post-money; its actual Series B was $115M at $1.6B (April 2021). The proposed terms match no public round. Pricing must be re-confirmed with the company before any further work; Form D and cap table were not checked in this pass.

8. Return scenarios (on the stated $15M at $400M post)

Illustrative scenarios. Revenue paths, exit multiples, dilution and timing are my assumptions (estimate; not company-specific and not sourced), shown so the partner can change them. Ownership at exit = 3.75% x (1 - 40% cumulative dilution) = 2.25%.

Case

Exit value

MOIC on $15M

Assumptions

Bear

$1.0B

1.5x

Revenue at exit $250M x 4x multiple; 40% dilution; exit in year 6

Base

$3.0B

4.5x

Revenue at exit $500M x 6x multiple; 40% dilution; exit in year 5-6

Bull

$6.0B

9.0x

Revenue at exit $750M x 8x multiple; 40% dilution; exit in year 5

Break-even to target: 10x requires $150M of proceeds, i.e. about $6.7B exit at 40% dilution, or $4.0B with no dilution (arithmetic). Even the bull case falls short of 10x. Exit multiples are anchored loosely on the public comps above (1.9x to 7.9x EV/Revenue). Sensitivity at the public mark: $15M at $44B buys about 0.034%; at 40% dilution, 10x needs about $440B / (1 - 0.40), roughly $733B exit (arithmetic).

9. Key risks with mitigants

Risk

Mitigant

Entity or data-room mismatch: deck metrics and terms conflict with public record

None identified; resolve before any further diligence

Valuation: supplied $400M post vs $44B public mark; return math unattainable at public price

None identified; confirm round and price with company

Competition: Brex (now Capital One-owned), Rippling and others in spend management (TechCrunch, Jun and Jan 2026)

Ramp reports 100%+ YoY enterprise growth and positive FCF (company-reported, Series F release)

Bank-partner dependency: cards issued via partner banks (Ramp profile page)

Not found; diligence question

Regulatory/legal: a July 2026 state attorney-general letter involving Ramp appeared in search results; not reviewed

Not found; read the letter and check dockets and sanctions lists

Market-cycle: fintech comps vary widely (BILL 1.9x vs Navan 7.9x EV/Revenue)

Revenue growth and profitability, per company; unverified by fund

10. Recommendation (points for partner to confirm)

  • Do not advance on the supplied terms until the entity and data-room mismatch is explained; the evidence does not support the deck as a description of the current ramp.com company.
  • If a real opportunity exists in a different or earlier-stage company, re-run this memo with that company’s own data; the returns table structure and break-even arithmetic can be reused.
  • Fit with the fund’s Series A/B fintech infrastructure mandate: not met for Ramp at its public stage (Series F, $44B). Partner to confirm.

Diligence questions

  1. Is the deck from ramp.com or another company? If Ramp, what date is the snapshot (the supplied figures fit no current period)?
  2. Which legal entity is issuing the Series B, and what are the filed Form D amounts and date (not checked)?
  3. How is ARR defined (revenue vs interchange vs software), and how does $28M reconcile to the public “over $1B annualized revenue”?
  4. What is the cohort basis for 140% NDR, and what is gross retention?
  5. What explains $1.8M monthly burn against a public statement of positive free cash flow?
  6. What are the founders’ and executives’ prior roles and any prior company outcomes (not retrieved)?
  7. What is the contractual position with issuing banks, and what happens on partner-bank change?
  8. What does the July 2026 state attorney-general letter concern, and has Ramp responded?
  9. What is the customer concentration and the revenue split between cards, procurement and accounting?

Do next

  • Ask the sponsor to confirm entity, legal name and deck date in writing.
  • Pull SEC EDGAR Form D filings for Ramp and compare to the supplied terms.
  • Read the Series F release and the Nov 2025 release in full against the deck line by line.
  • Review the state AG letter and run litigation and sanctions checks.
  • Build the bottom-up TAM with sourced customer counts and spend per customer.

Coverage note

Not reached or not done: Crunchbase/PitchBook (not used), SEC EDGAR Form D, Ramp pricing page and changelog, G2/Capterra, hiring data, litigation and sanctions databases, Glyman background, Rippling valuation, the April 2026 procurement-agents release, and the July 2026 state AG letter (listed in search results only). Value Sense multiples are third-party aggregates; pages did not state an update time beyond the quarter noted.

Sources

04

FAQ

What does Investment Memo Drafter need to run?

Investment Memo Drafter needs company name and website; deal terms and round details (optional), materials and notes from the company (optional) and fund thesis or memo template (optional) are optional.

How often does Investment Memo Drafter run?

It runs when you ask, and you can put it on a daily, weekly or monthly schedule.

What does Investment Memo Drafter deliver?

Every run delivers a Word document, with every claim linked to its source.

Can I change what Investment Memo Drafter does?

Yes. Every GREP AI agent can be cloned into your workspace, where you can edit its instructions, add your own sources and files, and change its schedule.

Run Investment Memo Drafter in minutes.

Free to start. Run it once, put it on a schedule, or clone it and make it yours.