performance
Verified Performance Benchmarks
Transparent, verified performance benchmarks for Grep AI. 94% research accuracy, 15-minute turnaround, 50+ sources per report. Updated quarterly.
Each claim has a visible scope, source, as-of date, and review deadline.
Browse the evidence registerVerified Performance Benchmarks
Performance & Accuracy
We believe in transparency about our capabilities. These benchmarks are derived from systematic testing across thousands of research tasks, verified against ground-truth datasets, and updated quarterly.
How We Measure Performance
Our benchmarking process is designed to be rigorous, reproducible, and transparent.
We maintain a curated dataset of entities with known risk profiles, verified by human experts. This serves as the baseline for measuring accuracy.
GREP AI research is run against the ground-truth dataset without any prior knowledge of expected results. Outputs are compared against known findings.
We measure accuracy across multiple dimensions: entity identification, risk factor detection, source citation accuracy, and completeness of coverage.
Benchmarks are re-run quarterly with updated datasets and methodology. Results are published transparently, including any declines.
Benchmark results directly inform engineering priorities. When we identify gaps, we address them in subsequent releases.
Data Sources & Coverage
Explore the comprehensive data sources that power Grep's research capabilities.
Verify Our Claims Yourself
Don't take our benchmarks at face value. Run a research report on an entity you already know well and compare GREP AI's findings against your existing intelligence.
Performance metrics
How We Measure Performance
- 1
Ground-Truth Dataset
We maintain a curated dataset of entities with known risk profiles, verified by human experts. This serves as the baseline for measuring accuracy.
- 2
Blind Testing
GREP AI research is run against the ground-truth dataset without any prior knowledge of expected results. Outputs are compared against known findings.
- 3
Multi-Dimensional Scoring
We measure accuracy across multiple dimensions: entity identification, risk factor detection, source citation accuracy, and completeness of coverage.
- 4
Quarterly Review
Benchmarks are re-run quarterly with updated datasets and methodology. Results are published transparently, including any declines.
- 5
Continuous Improvement
Benchmark results directly inform engineering priorities. When we identify gaps, we address them in subsequent releases.
Data Sources & Coverage
01 / catalog
Accuracy Metrics
performance-fact
4 records
Entity Identification
97% accuracy in correctly identifying and disambiguating target entities
View supporting evidenceRisk Factor Detection
94% detection rate for known risk factors (sanctions, litigation, adverse media)
View supporting evidenceCitation Accuracy
99%+ of cited sources link to valid, verifiable primary documents
View supporting evidenceFalse Positive Rate
Less than 5% false positive rate on sanctions and adverse media screening
View supporting evidence
02 / catalog
Speed Metrics
performance-fact
4 records
Ultra Fast Mode
Average completion in 2-3 minutes with core risk screening
View supporting evidenceStandard Mode
Average completion in 8-12 minutes with comprehensive coverage
View supporting evidenceDeep Research Mode
Average completion in 12-18 minutes with exhaustive analysis
View supporting evidenceAPI Response Time
Sub-second API acknowledgment with webhook delivery on completion
View supporting evidence
03 / catalog
Coverage Metrics
performance-fact
4 records
Jurisdictional Coverage
Corporate registry data available for 200+ countries and territories
View supporting evidenceSanctions List Coverage
50+ sanctions, watchlist, and PEP databases screened per query
View supporting evidenceMedia Coverage
Global news archive spanning 10+ years with multi-language support
View supporting evidenceCourt Record Coverage
Federal and major state court records across the United States
View supporting evidence
04 / catalog
Reliability Metrics
performance-fact
4 records
System Uptime
99.9% uptime over the trailing 12 months
View supporting evidenceData Freshness
Sanctions data updated within hours of official publication
View supporting evidenceReport Consistency
Same query produces consistent results — no methodology variance
View supporting evidenceSource Availability
98%+ source availability with automatic failover for maintenance windows
View supporting evidence
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you define 'accuracy'?
We measure accuracy as the percentage of known risk factors correctly identified in our ground-truth test dataset. This includes sanctions matches, litigation findings, adverse media, and corporate registry data. Our 94% accuracy rate reflects the overall detection rate across all risk categories.
Why not 100% accuracy?
No research system — human or AI — achieves 100% accuracy. The remaining 6% typically involves edge cases: entities with extremely common names requiring disambiguation, findings only available in non-digital records, or very recent events not yet indexed by our sources. We're transparent about our limitations.
How do these benchmarks compare to manual research?
Independent comparisons show that a typical manual research process using 5-10 databases achieves approximately 60-75% coverage of the findings GREP AI produces from 50+ databases. Human researchers may catch nuances that AI misses, but miss far more through limited source coverage.
Are these benchmarks independently verified?
Our benchmarking methodology is documented and reproducible. We welcome third-party verification and have shared our methodology with enterprise customers for independent validation.
How often are benchmarks updated?
We re-run our complete benchmark suite quarterly with updated ground-truth datasets. Results are published on this page within two weeks of testing completion. We report all results, including any performance declines.
Evidence register
Every claim used on this page, with its scope, date, review deadline, and supporting source.
24 evidence claims
Verified Performance Benchmarks
- Scope:
- performance-page-snapshot
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
We believe in transparency about our capabilities. These benchmarks are derived from systematic testing across thousands of research tasks, verified against ground-truth datasets, and updated quarterly.
- Scope:
- performance-page-snapshot
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
We maintain a curated dataset of entities with known risk profiles, verified by human experts. This serves as the baseline for measuring accuracy.
- Scope:
- performance-page-snapshot
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Explore the comprehensive data sources that power Grep's research capabilities.
- Scope:
- performance-page-snapshot
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Research Accuracy: 94%
- Scope:
- performance-stat
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Average Completion: 15 min
- Scope:
- performance-stat
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Sources per Report: 50+
- Scope:
- performance-stat
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Reports Generated: 10,000+
- Scope:
- performance-stat
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Entity Identification: 97% accuracy in correctly identifying and disambiguating target entities
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Risk Factor Detection: 94% detection rate for known risk factors (sanctions, litigation, adverse media)
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Citation Accuracy: 99%+ of cited sources link to valid, verifiable primary documents
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
False Positive Rate: Less than 5% false positive rate on sanctions and adverse media screening
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Ultra Fast Mode: Average completion in 2-3 minutes with core risk screening
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Standard Mode: Average completion in 8-12 minutes with comprehensive coverage
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Deep Research Mode: Average completion in 12-18 minutes with exhaustive analysis
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
API Response Time: Sub-second API acknowledgment with webhook delivery on completion
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Jurisdictional Coverage: Corporate registry data available for 200+ countries and territories
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Sanctions List Coverage: 50+ sanctions, watchlist, and PEP databases screened per query
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Media Coverage: Global news archive spanning 10+ years with multi-language support
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Court Record Coverage: Federal and major state court records across the United States
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
System Uptime: 99.9% uptime over the trailing 12 months
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Data Freshness: Sanctions data updated within hours of official publication
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Report Consistency: Same query produces consistent results — no methodology variance
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx
Source Availability: 98%+ source availability with automatic failover for maintenance windows
- Scope:
- performance-fact
- As of:
- Review by:
- Snapshot:
- src/components/marketing/trust/PerformanceBenchmarks.tsx